ASB

Productivity6 min read

Bullet journal: why the ugly version works better

The original bullet journal is fast, ugly and takes thirty seconds a day. What the internet made of it is something else — and that is the one you quit in February.

I bought the notebook on a Saturday.

Hardcover, black, elastic band, thick paper that looks expensive because it is. I also took four fine-liners, a ruler and polka-dot tape. The woman at the counter asked if it was a gift.

I said yes. And it was.

The first three weeks were glorious. I made the index. I built a habit tracker with twelve little squares per row, all the same size, which took the ruler and a patience I did not know I had.

In week four I painted a pumpkin in the margin.

It was not October.

The February page is still blank. Not the blank of someone who will fill it later: the blank of a notebook in a drawer, under a charger that fits nothing in this house.

It took me two years to work out that the problem had not been me. Or the notebook. The problem was that I copied Pinterest thinking I was copying the method.

What Ryder Carroll invented, before the internet arrived

The original bullet journal is extremely dull.

Ryder Carroll, the designer behind the system, calls its core rapid logging. Every entry is one line, opened by a symbol: a dot for a task, its own mark for an event, a dash for a note. Done becomes an X. Pushed forward gets an arrow to the right.

That is it. No colour. No ruler. No pumpkin.

On top of that sit three lists: daily, monthly and future. At the end of each month comes migration: you copy out by hand, item by item, whatever you still want.

One notebook, one pen, four symbols.

The science, which comes in here rather quietly

I am treading carefully now.

There is no controlled study on bullet journaling. None. There are testimonials, videos with a soundtrack, blogs swearing a notebook changed a life. It may well have. But that is anecdote with good lighting.

What exists is research on writing by hand — similar, but not the same thing.

The most cited study is Pam Mueller and Daniel Oppenheimer's, in Psychological Science in 2014, under the unbeatable title "The Pen Is Mightier Than the Keyboard". Across three experiments, longhand note-takers did better on conceptual questions than typists.

Lovely. Then came the replication.

In 2019, Kayla Morehead, John Dunlosky and Katherine Rawson redid it in Educational Psychology Review, adding a group that took no notes at all. Performance did not consistently differ between the groups — not even the ones who just listened. In the authors' own meta-analysis, the effect favouring longhand was small and not significant.

The slogan does not hold up as a slogan.

A 2024 paper in Frontiers in Psychology, by Van der Weel and Van der Meer, put electrodes on 36 university students and saw more widespread brain connectivity during handwriting. It is 36 young right-handed people, and EEG connectivity is not remembering what you wrote.

So the honest sentence is this: the pen probably helps a little, for a dull reason with no neuroscience in it. By hand you cannot write everything. So you choose.

Where the pretty notebook lost me

Friction is the toll a method charges before it lets you use it.

The original charges almost nothing: open, write a line, close. The social-media version charges a fresh layout every week, a decorated header, and the feeling that you cannot write "dentist" in there without preparing the page.

An organised head can pay that.

For someone who struggles to keep any system going — and here I raise my hand — the toll lands at the worst moment. Nobody draws the February layout in the calm week, they draw it in the week when everything happens at once.

That is when the notebook becomes a debt.

And the pretty notebook is public: it was made to be photographed. A system you would be embarrassed to let get ugly is abandoned in the first ugly week.

How to keep a deliberately ugly bullet journal

What migration does not migrate

The ugly notebook fixes adherence. It does not fix timing.

It is a stationary object. It does not know it is quarter to three and the clinic closes at five. It does not open itself on Friday. It nudges nobody.

If you are the type who writes things down and never comes back — and the notebook in the drawer is my CV in that field — the bullet journal solves half the problem: capture. The other half, showing up on time, is still done in your head.

And your head was the part that was faulty.

Why I went and built something else

I have four beautiful notebooks at home, none more than six weeks filled in. They all failed at the same point: they were places I had to go to, and I only went on days I did not need them.

ASB came out of that missing half: writing things down in the ugliest way possible, one loose sentence on WhatsApp, and letting it come back and talk to me at the right time.

Meet ASB

Get it all out of your head, in one place

Inbox, tasks, projects, calendar and notes in the same place — fed by conversation instead of form filling. ASB is the second brain that answers back.

  • Every project starts with "To do" and "Done" boards.
  • XP, achievements and streaks for the days motivation does not show up.
  • Web and mobile apps, with the assistant in the middle.
Create my accountStart on the free beta plan.

Frequently asked questions

What is a bullet journal?

It is a notebook system created by the designer Ryder Carroll in which every task, event or note becomes a single line marked by a symbol: a dot for a task, an X for done, an arrow for migrated. On top of that sit the daily, monthly and future logs. The name for it is rapid logging, and the whole point is to write less, not more.

Does a bullet journal have to look good?

No, and this is probably the biggest confusion around the method. Carroll's original system has no colour, no ruler and no weekly layout — the internet added all of that later. A decorated notebook charges you setup work you will not do in the hard weeks, which are exactly the weeks you would need it most.

Is there scientific research on bullet journaling?

There is no controlled study on the method itself. What exists is research on handwriting versus typing, and it is far less conclusive than the internet suggests: the classic 2014 study found an advantage for the pen, but the 2019 replication did not confirm the difference. Treat any promise of a cognitive boost with suspicion.

Sources

About the author

Matheus Valadares

Founder of ASB

Developer and founder of ASB. He built Sofia after realising the problem was never a missing to-do app — it was having to remember to open one.

Keep reading

Back to the blog